Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than HTC Bolt's general score of 75. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is notably newer than HTC Bolt, it's a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The HTC Bolt counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than HTC Bolt, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a lot lower display pixels density, it also counts with a larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC Bolt, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than HTC Bolt, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a bigger aperture. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than HTC Bolt, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.