Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-11-11 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.06 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force is a little bit better than the HTC Bolt, having a global score of 75.8 against 75. The Moto Z Force body is thinner and a bit lighter than the HTC Bolt, even though both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. HTC Bolt features just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (but slower).
HTC Bolt has a little bit better display than Motorola Moto Z Force. Both of them have the same display pixel density, exactly the same 1440 x 2560 resolution and a display of the same size. Moto Z Force features a better memory for applications and games than HTC Bolt, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the Moto Z Force also has more internal memory.
Moto Z Force takes a little bit better photos and videos than HTC Bolt, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Moto Z Force also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with just a little better battery duration than HTC Bolt, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.