Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2016-11-11 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.06 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than HTC Bolt, having a overall score of 80.4 against 75. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition construction is a little thinner and just a little lighter than HTC Bolt, even when they were only released 8 months apart. The HTC Bolt has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the HTC Bolt also counts with a little higher display density.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit more powerful processor than HTC Bolt, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has 1 GB more RAM memory. HTC Bolt features a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a battery life that's very similar to the battery duration in HTC Bolt. The HTC Bolt has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the HTC Bolt also counts with a lot better 16 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.