Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.06 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 3 | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the HTC Bolt's 75 score. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a extremely newer cellphone than the HTC Bolt, but it is way thicker and noticeably heavier. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better screen than HTC Bolt, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a little greater pixel number per inch of screen.
The HTC Bolt counts with a slightly better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little faster processing unit than HTC Bolt, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has more RAM memory.
The HTC Bolt has a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier aperture, it also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and a much higher video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better battery duration than HTC Bolt, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.