Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.06 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than HTC Bolt, getting an 81 score against 75. Even though Galaxy XCover Pro is incredibly newer than HTC Bolt, it's a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. The HTC Bolt features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel count per display inch.
The HTC Bolt features a slightly better storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better performance than HTC Bolt, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro's camera is just as good as the camera in HTC Bolt, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a back facing camera with a lot higher 25 MP resolution and a larger camera aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations, they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features improved battery life than HTC Bolt, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.