Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.06 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has an overall score of 79, which is a bit better than the HTC Bolt's 75 overall score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's body is newer than HTC Bolt's, although it's heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit better performance than HTC Bolt, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has more RAM.
The HTC Bolt has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. HTC Bolt counts with a bit more memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a superior camera than HTC Bolt, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a larger aperture and a much more megapixels back camera. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a superior battery duration than HTC Bolt, because it has a 57% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.