Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-01 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than the HTC Desire 10 pro, having an 88.1 score against 74.3. The Apple iPhone X construction is newer and just a little thinner, but also a bit heavier than HTC Desire 10 pro. IPhone X has a brighter screen than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a bit more pixels per display inch.
The iPhone X has a greater processing power than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The iPhone X features a superior camera than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution and a much smaller back camera sensor capturing much worse quality videos and pictures, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
The HTC Desire 10 pro features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The HTC Desire 10 pro has just a bit better battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.