Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-01 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is much better than the HTC Desire 10 pro, having an 84.2 score against 74.3. The iPhone XS construction is newer and just a bit thinner than HTC Desire 10 pro's, although it is just a bit heavier. The iPhone XS has a sharper display than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a bit bigger screen.
HTC Desire 10 pro has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS, and although they both have equal internal storage, the HTC Desire 10 pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. IPhone XS has a quite better processing power than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has 2 less processing cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The HTC Desire 10 pro features a little better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 13% bigger battery size. The Apple iPhone XS captures much better photos and videos than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.