Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than HTC Desire 10 pro, having a general score of 81.3 against 74.3. The LG V35 ThinQ design is newer, just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than HTC Desire 10 pro. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a bit larger screen and a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch.
The LG V35 ThinQ has as much memory to install applications and games as the HTC Desire 10 pro, both of them have equal internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ captures much clearer videos and photos than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor shooting lot lower quality photographs and a less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot larger aperture for better low light photos and video. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit longer battery performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.