Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a global score of 80.3, which is a bit better than the HTC Desire 10 pro's 74.3 global score. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's body is much newer than HTC Desire 10 pro's, although it is much heavier and somewhat thicker. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the previous 10 version and HTC Desire 10 pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit better processing unit than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM. HTC Desire 10 pro and Nokia 8 V 5G UW both feature incredibly similar displays, because although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a little bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
HTC Desire 10 pro has a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the HTC Desire 10 pro also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a lot better camera than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments, a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a really longer battery life than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.