Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is much better than the HTC Desire 10 pro, with an 85.5 score against 74.3. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version while HTC Desire 10 pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Galaxy A51 is a a little heavier phone than HTC Desire 10 pro, but both are 0.31inches thick.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a bit superior processing unit than HTC Desire 10 pro. They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a little more vivid display than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little greater screen pixels density and a larger display.
The Galaxy A51 takes a lot better photographs and videos than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a back camera with a much better resolution, a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a larger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments. The HTC Desire 10 pro has just a bit more storage for apps and games than Galaxy A51, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A51 has improved battery life than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a 33% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.