Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-01 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is a lot better than the HTC Desire 10 pro's 74.3 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is notably newer, but a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than HTC Desire 10 pro. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little sharper screen than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A52 features a little bit better processing power than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52 counts with a way better battery life than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Galaxy A52 shoots much better videos and photos than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a camera with way more mega pixels, a way larger back camera sensor and a larger aperture to take better low light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.