Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is a lot better than HTC Desire 10 pro's 74.3 global score. Both devices in this review include Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and HTC Desire 10 pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Even though Galaxy Fold is heavier than HTC Desire 10 pro, it's thinner and also a lot newer.
Galaxy Fold counts with a display that is very similar to the display in HTC Desire 10 pro, because although the Galaxy Fold has a little worse pixel amount in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels and a lot bigger display. The Galaxy Fold features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy Fold features a bit better hardware performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a superior camera than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a back camera with much less megapixels resolution and a smaller back camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, it also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a really longer battery lifetime than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.