Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is way better than HTC Desire 10 pro, having a overall score of 90.8 against 74.3. Galaxy Note 20's body is notably newer than HTC Desire 10 pro's, although it's somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a slightly better display than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a quite worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. HTC Desire 10 pro features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a superior battery lifetime than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a 43% larger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a very superior camera than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.