Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the HTC Desire 10 pro, with a 98.9 score against 74.3. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a incredibly newer phone than HTC Desire 10 pro, but it's just a little bit thicker and notably heavier. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version while HTC Desire 10 pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit superior processing unit than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little sharper screen than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a larger display, a little greater pixels count in each inch in the screen and a much higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a larger camera aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a really longer battery performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.