Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than HTC Desire 10 pro, getting a overall score of 81.2 against 74.3. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version and HTC Desire 10 pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a better cellphone than the HTC Desire 10 pro, we must note that it is also a lot older, a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit faster CPU than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better screen than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a quite worse screen pixels density, and they both have an equal 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a bit bigger screen.
HTC Desire 10 pro has a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the HTC Desire 10 pro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note 3 has a little better battery life than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a 7% larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 captures much better photos and videos than HTC Desire 10 pro, although it has a lot tinier camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors and a back camera with a way worse resolution, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.