Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-01 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is better than HTC Desire 10 pro, having an 89 score against 74.3. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a a little heavier device than HTC Desire 10 pro, but they have the same thickness. Galaxy Note10 features a little more vivid screen than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2280 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 features just a little better performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM. The HTC Desire 10 pro features more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Note10 shoots better photographs and videos than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution and a tinier back camera sensor providing a lower image quality, it also counts with a way larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and video.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.