Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-01 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than the HTC Desire 10 pro, getting a score of 89.7 against 74.3. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite construction is notably newer than the HTC Desire 10 pro's, but it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit superior CPU than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better looking display than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a just a little lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger display. Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit more memory for apps and games than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a very superior battery life than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a lot better camera than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.