Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the HTC Desire 10 pro, having a overall score of 90.8 against 74.3. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version and HTC Desire 10 pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Galaxy S20 FE is a much newer device than the HTC Desire 10 pro, but it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a little bit better display than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a just a little more pixels per screen inch, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S20 FE has a superior battery performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a 50 percent greater battery size.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a lot better camera than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor and a bigger camera aperture for better captures in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.