Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the HTC Desire 10 pro, getting a general score of 95.4 against 74.3. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is incredibly newer, but thicker and extremely heavier than the HTC Desire 10 pro. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and HTC Desire 10 pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better screen than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a little higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a larger display. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit more powerful processor than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better camera than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a way bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a lot more MP back-facing camera and a bigger aperture to take better low light images. HTC Desire 10 pro has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior battery life than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.