Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blue and Red |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 5.5 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a general score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the HTC Desire 10 pro's 74.3 overall score. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S5 Sport has the older 4.4.2 version and HTC Desire 10 pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Although Galaxy S5 Sport is extremely older and somewhat thicker than HTC Desire 10 pro, it's design is still just a bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a little better performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. The Galaxy S5 Sport features a more vivid screen than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1920 x 1080px resolution, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a just a bit higher pixels number in each display inch.
The Galaxy S5 Sport captures much better pictures and videos than HTC Desire 10 pro, although it has a camera in the back with lesser MP and a tinier back camera sensor taking worse quality videos and images, they both have the same diafragm aperture. HTC Desire 10 pro features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The HTC Desire 10 pro features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.