Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-01 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than the HTC Desire 10 pro's general score of 74.3. The Samsung Galaxy S7 design has the same thickness than the HTC Desire 10 pro, but it's a bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a way better looking display than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The HTC Desire 10 pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the HTC Desire 10 pro also has a larger number of cores (but slower). The HTC Desire 10 pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S7 features a battery life that's very similar to HTC Desire 10 pro's battery life. The Galaxy S7 captures much clearer pictures and videos than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse resolution and a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.