Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than HTC Desire 10 pro, getting an 81 score against 74.3. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro design is way newer, but noticeably heavier and way thicker than HTC Desire 10 pro. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version and HTC Desire 10 pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than HTC Desire 10 pro. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little more vivid display than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite better display pixels density.
The HTC Desire 10 pro features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the HTC Desire 10 pro also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a superior camera than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a much tinier sensor offering a way worse image quality, it also counts with a more mega pixels back camera and a way bigger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better battery duration than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.