Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the HTC Desire 10 pro, with a global score of 88.5 against 74.3. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is much newer and a bit thinner, but just a bit heavier than HTC Desire 10 pro. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version while HTC Desire 10 pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit sharper display than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a larger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a quite greater number of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better processing power than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM.
HTC Desire 10 pro has a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip has a much better camera than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera and a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.