Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.0 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2013-06-18 | 2013-03-14 |
| 4.24 x 2.39 x 0.47 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.53 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 7.38 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 34.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.27 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1230mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 693 hours standby time 10.9 hours talk time | 17 hours talk time |
| 2.88 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S4 is much better than HTC Desire 200, having a 76.1 score against 51.4. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S4 has newer 4.4.2 version while HTC Desire 200 has Android 4.0, giving you a lot of extra features and increased performance. Although Samsung Galaxy S4 and HTC Desire 200 were released with only 3 months difference, Samsung Galaxy S4's design is way thinner but also notably heavier than HTC Desire 200.
Samsung Galaxy S4 has a very superior processing power than HTC Desire 200, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory, more cpu cores and an extra graphics co-processor. The Galaxy S4 counts with a way better screen than HTC Desire 200, because it has a way greater display density, a way bigger display and a much better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
Galaxy S4 takes a lot better photos and videos than HTC Desire 200, because it has a lot better (Full HD) video definition, a much higher 13 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a much bigger diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy S4 has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than HTC Desire 200, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 64 GB and 16 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S4 counts with a superior battery performance than HTC Desire 200, because it has 2600mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy S4 is also cheaper than the HTC Desire 200, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.