Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-06-28 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.55 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.25 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Starry Night Black and Wave Gold | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is much better than HTC Desire 22 Pro's 73.6 global score. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and HTC Desire 22 Pro has Android 12. Galaxy A50s is an extremely older phone than HTC Desire 22 Pro, but Samsung could make it lighter and thinner.
Galaxy A50s has a little sharper display than HTC Desire 22 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than HTC Desire 22 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with an extremely better processor than HTC Desire 22 Pro, because although it has 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with 7 more processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much better camera than HTC Desire 22 Pro, although it has a way lower resolution back facing camera and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video.
The HTC Desire 22 Pro has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.