Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-06-28 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.55 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.25 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Starry Night Black and Wave Gold | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than HTC Desire 22 Pro's overall score of 73.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and HTC Desire 22 Pro has Android 12, so it counts with some additional features. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older and a little bit heavier device than the HTC Desire 22 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better screen than HTC Desire 22 Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a little bit better pixel amount per inch of display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC Desire 22 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much greater performance than HTC Desire 22 Pro, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than HTC Desire 22 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The HTC Desire 22 Pro counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 4520mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.