Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-06-28 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.55 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.25 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Starry Night Black and Wave Gold | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is slightly better than HTC Desire 22 Pro's global score of 73.6. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and HTC Desire 22 Pro has Android 12. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 design is thinner and somewhat lighter than HTC Desire 22 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a much better processing power than HTC Desire 22 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Single-Core processor. The Galaxy Note 5 features a much sharper screen than HTC Desire 22 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher display pixel density.
The HTC Desire 22 Pro features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than HTC Desire 22 Pro, although it has a lot less mega-pixels camera in the back and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or video in low-light situations.
HTC Desire 22 Pro features a superior battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4520mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.