Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-06-28 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.55 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.25 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Starry Night Black and Wave Gold | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is way better than the HTC Desire 22 Pro, having a global score of 90.8 against 73.6. Even though Galaxy S20 FE is older than the HTC Desire 22 Pro, it's body is just a little lighter and thinner. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version while HTC Desire 22 Pro has Android 12.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a slightly better looking display than HTC Desire 22 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a lot better hardware performance than HTC Desire 22 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster).
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than HTC Desire 22 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 FE captures a little bit better photographs and videos than HTC Desire 22 Pro, although it has a much less megapixels camera in the back, they both have a same size camera aperture.
HTC Desire 22 Pro features just a little better battery life than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 0 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.