Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-28 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.55 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.25 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Starry Night Black and Wave Gold | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4520mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is better than the HTC Desire 22 Pro, having an 83.3 score against 73.6. Galaxy S9 is an incredibly older phone than HTC Desire 22 Pro, but it is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Galaxy S9 counts with a much better display than HTC Desire 22 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
Galaxy S9 has more memory to install games and applications than HTC Desire 22 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB. The Galaxy S9 features a much powerful processing unit than HTC Desire 22 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores.
HTC Desire 22 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 51% larger battery size. The Galaxy S9 features a slightly better camera than HTC Desire 22 Pro, because although it has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.