Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| 2014-03-06 | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.21 x 2.68 x 0.44 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6582M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.6 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is much better than HTC Desire 310, with an 83.3 score against 57.1. Galaxy S9 is a newer and extremely thinner cellphone than the HTC Desire 310, although it is heavier. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a lot better screen than HTC Desire 310, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960, a bigger screen and much more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy S9 has a very superior memory to install applications and games than HTC Desire 310, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB. Galaxy S9 features a faster processor than HTC Desire 310, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores and more RAM.
Galaxy S9 takes much better pictures and videos than HTC Desire 310, because it has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels, a lot higher (4K) video quality and a much larger aperture. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much better battery duration than HTC Desire 310, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a little more expensive than HTC Desire 310, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.