Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4
3GSM-G357FZ
| Global Score | |
| 58.6 | 60.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 4.4 |
| 2015-07-15 | 2014-06-30 |
| 5.51 x 2.76 x 0.39 inches | 4.78 x 2.48 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 4.37 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 145.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 234 pixels per inch | 217 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Single-Core 1100 MHz) processor | Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 512 MB RAM |
| Adreno 304 GPU | Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 7.56 | 7.92 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.06 | 4.26 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.5 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 600 hours standby time | 11 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Ace 4 has a score of 60.7, which is slightly better than the HTC Desire 526's 58.6 score. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Ace 4 has 4.4 version and HTC Desire 526 has Android 5.1 version. The Galaxy Ace 4 is an older and a little bit thicker cellphone than HTC Desire 526, but Samsung managed to build it notably lighter anyway.
Galaxy Ace 4 counts with a bit faster CPU than HTC Desire 526, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (but slower) and an additional graphics processing unit. Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 counts with a little bit better display than HTC Desire 526, although it has a quite lower resolution of 800 x 480px, a little smaller display and a quite worse count of pixels per inch of display.
HTC Desire 526 features a way bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 200 GB and 4 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 has a bit better camera than HTC Desire 526, although it has a much lower 5 mega pixels resolution back camera and a worse (HD) video resolution.
The HTC Desire 526 has longer battery duration than Galaxy Ace 4, because it has 2000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.