Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.1 | -- |
| 2013-05-23 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.31 x 2.64 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | P-OLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 539 hours standby time 11.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than HTC Desire 600, with an 81.3 score against 58.9. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is heavier than the HTC Desire 600, it's thinner and also much newer. LG V35 ThinQ has a brighter screen than HTC Desire 600, because it has a much better pixel density, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a lot bigger display.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a better performing processor than HTC Desire 600, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than HTC Desire 600, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 56 GB more internal storage capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ features a superior battery lifetime than HTC Desire 600, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ has a lot better camera than HTC Desire 600, because it has a lot higher video definition, a way more mega pixels back camera and a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than the HTC Desire 600, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.