Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.9 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Android 4.1 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-05-23 | 2019-06-10 |
| 5.31 x 2.64 x 0.36 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | IPS LCD |
| 245 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.37 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 539 hours standby time 11.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 A is a bit better than HTC Desire 600, getting a 64.8 score against 58.9. The Nokia 3.1 A is a notably newer phone than the HTC Desire 600, although it's heavier and a little bit thicker. These phones use Android operating system, but the Nokia 3.1 A has newer 9.0 Pie version and HTC Desire 600 has Android 4.1, so it provides some additional features.
Nokia 3.1 A has a little bit better processing power than HTC Desire 600, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, and they both have 4 processing cores, the Nokia 3.1 A also counts with more RAM memory. The HTC Desire 600 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 3.1 A, although it has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per inch of display, a little bit smaller screen and a way lower 960 x 540 resolution.
Nokia 3.1 A captures better photographs and videos than HTC Desire 600, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Nokia 3.1 A also has a lot higher video resolution. Nokia 3.1 A has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC Desire 600, because it has 32 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits up to 128 GB.
Nokia 3.1 A has a superior battery performance than HTC Desire 600, because it has a 61% larger battery capacity.
Nokia 3.1 A not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.