Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2016-12-01 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.78 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 294 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8926 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.36 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 4.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is better than HTC Desire 650's overall score of 67.1. HTC One M9 is an older, somewhat thicker and heavier phone than the HTC Desire 650. HTC One M9 features a more powerful processor than HTC Desire 650, because it has a larger number of faster cores, an additional graphics processor, 1 GB more RAM memory and a 64-bit processing unit.
The HTC One M9 features a much better display than HTC Desire 650, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the HTC One M9 also has a way better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a better display pixels density. HTC One M9 has a superior camera than HTC Desire 650, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking images and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
HTC Desire 650 counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. HTC One M9 counts with superior battery life than HTC Desire 650, because it has 2840mAh of battery capacity against 2200mAh.
The HTC One M9 is a bit more expensive than the HTC Desire 650, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.