Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.1 | 73.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-12-01 | 2018-07-13 |
| 5.78 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 107.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 294 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8926 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.36 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star is a little bit better than HTC Desire 650, with a global score of 73.1 against 67.1. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star design is newer, but noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker than the HTC Desire 650. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has a bit better hardware performance than HTC Desire 650, and although they both have a 2 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star also has 4 more cores.
The HTC Desire 650 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 720 x 1280px, the HTC Desire 650 also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density. The Galaxy J7 Star shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than HTC Desire 650, and although they both have a 13 megapixels back-facing camera, the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy J7 Star also has a bigger aperture.
The HTC Desire 650 has a superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has only 16 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy J7 Star has a way better battery life than HTC Desire 650, because it has a 50% greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.