Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-02-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray, Green, Pink, Red, White and Yellow | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 259.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is way better than the HTC Desire 816's 65.1 overall score. The LG V35 ThinQ design is notably newer, just a little thinner and just a bit lighter than the HTC Desire 816. LG V35 ThinQ has a quite better hardware performance than HTC Desire 816, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 4,5 GB more RAM memory and more CPU cores.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better display than HTC Desire 816, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a lot higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a lot better pixels density. The LG V35 ThinQ captures much clearer pictures and videos than HTC Desire 816, because it has a way higher video resolution, a better 16 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger camera aperture.
LG V35 ThinQ features a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC Desire 816, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory. The LG V35 ThinQ features longer battery duration than HTC Desire 816, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than the HTC Desire 816, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.