Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 65.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2014-02-24 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray, Green, Pink, Red, White and Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 259.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 2 | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 21 hours talk time | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is way better than the HTC Desire 816, having a general score of 81.2 against 65.1. The Galaxy Note 3 is better than HTC Desire 816, it must be told that it's also a a little thicker and a bit heavier phone. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and HTC Desire 816 has Android 4.4.2.
Galaxy Note 3 features a little faster processor than HTC Desire 816, and although they both have a 450 megahertz graphics co-processor and 4 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 3 also has 1,5 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a sharper screen than HTC Desire 816, because it has a little larger display, a lot better resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a higher pixel number per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC Desire 816, because although it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 64 GB against 128 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much better camera than HTC Desire 816, and although they both have a F2.2 aperture and a same resolution back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with superior battery performance than HTC Desire 816, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a little more expensive than the HTC Desire 816, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.