Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 260.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz + Quad-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is better than the HTC Desire 826's 69.3 general score. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is newer, a little thinner and lighter than HTC Desire 826. LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster CPU than HTC Desire 826, because although it has doesn't have a GPU and a 32-bits CPU against 64-bits, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory.
HTC Desire 826 counts with a little sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a way lower pixels density, a quite smaller screen and a lot lower 1920 x 1080 resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots greater photographs and videos than HTC Desire 826, because it has a much larger diafragm aperture and a back facing camera with more mega pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger memory to install games and applications than HTC Desire 826, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. LG V35 ThinQ counts with greater battery performance than HTC Desire 826, because it has a 27% bigger battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than the HTC Desire 826, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.