Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.22 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 260.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz + Quad-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is way better than HTC Desire 826, with a score of 87.1 against 69.3. LG Velvet is a just a little bit lighter device than the HTC Desire 826, but they have the same thickness. The HTC Desire 826 has a bit better hardware performance than LG Velvet, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC Desire 826 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an extra GPU.
HTC Desire 826 has a better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel count in each screen inch. The LG Velvet features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than HTC Desire 826, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet counts with a way better battery performance than HTC Desire 826, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh. The LG Velvet has a very superior camera than HTC Desire 826, because it has a bigger aperture and a camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
LG Velvet costs a little more than HTC Desire 826, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.