Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.4 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Android 4.0.3 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-06-10 |
| 4.22 x 2.39 x 0.47 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 3.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 90.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 165 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7225A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 7.02 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 34.00mm focal length | -- |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.27 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1230mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 2.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 A is a lot better than the HTC Desire C, with a 64.8 score against 50.4. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Nokia 3.1 A has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while HTC Desire C has Android 4.0.3, giving some nice extra features and performance enhancements. Nokia 3.1 A's design is noticeably heavier but incredibly thinner than the HTC Desire C.
Nokia 3.1 A has a way better performance than HTC Desire C, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. The Nokia 3.1 A features a more vivid display than HTC Desire C, because it has a much higher 720 x 1440 pixels resolution, a lot better screen pixel density and a really larger screen.
Nokia 3.1 A counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than HTC Desire C, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 128 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Nokia 3.1 A takes a lot better videos and photos than HTC Desire C, because it has a way more megapixels camera, a lot larger aperture for better captures and video in low-light environments and a lot better video resolution.
Nokia 3.1 A counts with a really longer battery duration than HTC Desire C, because it has a 143 percent more battery size.
The Nokia 3.1 A and the HTC Desire C cost the same, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.