Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 4.0.3 | -- |
| 2012-04-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.31 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | P-OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is way better than the HTC Evo 4G LTE's 64 overall score. Even though the Google Pixel 3 is a little bit heavier than HTC Evo 4G LTE, it's somewhat thinner and way newer. Google Pixel 3 counts with a little more vivid display than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has a way better 1080 x 2160 resolution, a bigger screen and more pixels per display inch.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3 has a more powerful processor than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a superior battery performance than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has a 2915mAh battery capacity instead of 2000mAh. The Google Pixel 3 takes better photos and videos than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has a larger camera aperture, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a way better (4K) video definition.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.