Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64 | 69 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.0.3 | Android 10 |
| 2012-04-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.31 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches | 5.82 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| -- | Silver |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 295 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 7.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K31 is a bit better than the HTC Evo 4G LTE, getting a 69 score against 64. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but LG K31 has 10 version while HTC Evo 4G LTE has Android 4.0.3 version. Although the LG K31 is a bit heavier than the HTC Evo 4G LTE, it's a bit thinner and also noticeably newer.
The LG K31 has a little faster processing unit than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The HTC Evo 4G LTE has a little sharper screen than LG K31, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
LG K31 features just a bit better camera than HTC Evo 4G LTE, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the LG K31 also has a back camera with much more mega pixels, higher 30 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
The LG K31 has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC Evo 4G LTE, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 32 GB, the LG K31 also has 32 GB internal storage capacity. The LG K31 features a much longer battery duration than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG K31 is also cheap compared to the HTC Evo 4G LTE, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.