Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64 | 69.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.0.3 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2012-04-04 | 2019-03-20 |
| 5.31 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 11.36 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 8.58 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K40 is a bit better than the HTC Evo 4G LTE, having a global score of 69.8 against 64. LG K40's construction is much newer and just a little bit thinner than the HTC Evo 4G LTE's, but it's just a little heavier. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the LG K40 has 8.1 Oreo version and HTC Evo 4G LTE has Android 4.0.3.
LG K40 has just a bit better hardware performance than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The HTC Evo 4G LTE counts with a bit better screen than LG K40, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit worse 1280 x 720 resolution, it also counts with a little higher display pixel density.
LG K40 has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than HTC Evo 4G LTE, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG K40 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K40 has a really longer battery life than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
The LG K40 takes slightly better photos and videos than HTC Evo 4G LTE, and although they both have the same camera aperture, a back camera with an 8 mega pixels and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the LG K40 also has better 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG K40 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.