Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64 | 69.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 4.0.3 | Android 10 |
| 2012-04-04 | 2020-06-12 |
| 5.31 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Champagne pink and Midnight blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 271 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3550mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto E (2020) is a bit better than the HTC Evo 4G LTE, getting a 69.7 score against 64. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Moto E (2020) has an older 10 version while HTC Evo 4G LTE has Android 4.0.3 version. Moto E (2020) is a notably newer and a little bit thinner phone than the HTC Evo 4G LTE, but it's notably heavier.
HTC Evo 4G LTE features just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto E (2020), because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels number in each screen inch. Moto E (2020) features a bit better performance than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster).
The Moto E (2020) features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB internal storage. Motorola Moto E (2020) features a little bit better camera than HTC Evo 4G LTE, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Moto E (2020) also has a lot higher resolution back camera and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Motorola Moto E (2020) features a really longer battery life than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has a 3550mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto E (2020) is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.