Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64 | 68.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.0.3 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2012-04-04 | 2018-07-09 |
| 5.31 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches | 5.62 x 2.76 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| S-LCD 2 | TFT |
| 312 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-T720 MP1 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 8.04 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has a general score of 68.7, which is a little bit better than the HTC Evo 4G LTE's overall score of 64. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while HTC Evo 4G LTE has Android 4.0.3. Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3's body has the same thickness than the HTC Evo 4G LTE, but it is heavier.
The HTC Evo 4G LTE features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM and 2 less cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The HTC Evo 4G LTE has a little bit better screen than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1280 x 720px resolution, the HTC Evo 4G LTE also counts with a little bit better display pixels density.
HTC Evo 4G LTE counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3, although it has slower 29 fps video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and a back facing camera with an 8 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Amp Prime 3 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than HTC Evo 4G LTE, and although they both have exactly the same 16 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Amp Prime 3 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 400 GB. The Galaxy Amp Prime 3 counts with superior battery duration than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has a 30 percent larger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy Amp Prime 3 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.