Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.0.3 | -- |
| 2012-04-04 | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.31 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is way better than HTC Evo 4G LTE's 64 global score. Galaxy S9 is a way newer and a bit thinner cellphone than the HTC Evo 4G LTE, but it's somewhat heavier. Galaxy S9 features a brighter screen than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has a lot greater display pixel density, a much higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a bigger screen.
Galaxy S9 has a better performing processing unit than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and more RAM. The Galaxy S9 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 400 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S9 has a really longer battery duration than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much better camera than HTC Evo 4G LTE, because it has a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography, a way better 12 MP resolution back camera and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S9 is also cheaper than the HTC Evo 4G LTE.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.