Compare phones
HTC EVO 4G
PC36100| Global Score | |
| 50.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 2.3, 2.2, 2.1 | -- |
| 2010-03-23 | 2017-10-19 |
| 4.80 x 2.60 x 0.50 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD8650 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 3.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a general score of 82.5, which is much better than the HTC EVO 4G's overall score of 50.3. Google Pixel 2 XL's design is noticeably newer and much thinner than the HTC EVO 4G's, but it is also just a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a much more vibrant display than HTC EVO 4G, because it has a lot better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution, a way greater display pixels density and a lot larger display.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a much better performing processing unit than HTC EVO 4G, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a greater camera than HTC EVO 4G, because it has a lot better video definition and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC EVO 4G, although it has no slot for an SD memory card. Google Pixel 2 XL has a very superior battery duration than HTC EVO 4G, because it has a 135% more battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.