Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 4.0, 2.3.3 | -- |
| 2011-10-19 | 2016-10-20 |
| 4.80 x 2.40 x 0.50 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.20 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 275 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Single-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 768 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 7.65 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1520mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a lot better than the HTC EVO Design 4G, with an 80.2 score against 55.2. Google Pixel is a a lot newer phone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and notably thinner than HTC EVO Design 4G. The Google Pixel features just a bit better display than HTC EVO Design 4G, because it has a way better screen pixels density, a lot better 1080 x 1920px resolution and a bigger screen.
The Google Pixel features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than HTC EVO Design 4G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel features a better performing processor than HTC EVO Design 4G, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel takes a lot better videos and photos than HTC EVO Design 4G, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with much more MP. Google Pixel features a really longer battery life than HTC EVO Design 4G, because it has an 82 percent greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.