Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.0, 2.3.3 | Android 10 |
| 2011-10-19 | 2020-05-05 |
| 4.80 x 2.40 x 0.50 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.20 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 275 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Single-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 768 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1520mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is way better than the HTC EVO Design 4G's general score of 55.2. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is much newer and incredibly thinner, but also notably heavier than HTC EVO Design 4G. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the newer 10 version while HTC EVO Design 4G has Android 4.0 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a slightly better looking display than HTC EVO Design 4G, because it has a really larger display, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a greater number of pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC EVO Design 4G, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a lot better processing power than HTC EVO Design 4G, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than HTC EVO Design 4G, because it has a camera with much more mega pixels and a lot higher video definition.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a really longer battery life than HTC EVO Design 4G, because it has a 230% larger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.